Founder
The Calatayud Advisory Office was founded on a belief: that real estate decisions of lasting consequence deserve a deeper level of inquiry, alignment, and care.
Carlos Calatayud established the institution to place advisory judgment at the center of real estate decision-making—where clarity of intent, understanding of risk, and long-horizon perspective shape outcomes before execution begins.
His work reflects a conviction that the most responsible guidance emerges not from momentum or convention, but from patient discovery, thoughtful questioning, and disciplined evaluation of evidence. Advisory, in this sense, is not a preliminary step—it is the foundation.

Over more than two decades, Carlos has advised, structured, and executed across in excess of $1 billion in real estate exposure, spanning land, development, luxury residential, and complex private-client engagements. This experience, observed across multiple cycles, informs an approach grounded in consequence rather than transaction.
The institution’s thinking is advanced through Equilibrium Development™ and Inventory Intelligence™—two integrated frameworks developed to support higher-order judgment. These frameworks combine deeply personal advisory inquiry with modern analytical capabilities, including advanced data and AI-enabled tools, to help reveal patterns, trade-offs, and opportunities that are often obscured by speed or noise.
Together, they allow decisions to be considered with greater depth, precision, and perspective—supporting guidance that is both innovative and disciplined, and execution that is intentional rather than reactive.
Carlos also founded Calatayud Brokerage as the selective execution arm of the institution, designed to operate only where advisory clarity has already been established and representation requires judgment beyond conventional brokerage models.
At the center of the institution is a guiding principle: advisory judgment must remain independent, governed solely by responsibility to the client’s interests and the integrity of the outcome.
The work of the institution reflects this posture—quiet, considered, and accountable to outcomes that endure.